ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author

2008-01-17 07:40:54
As I think has been hashed out before, it's utterly impossible to keep people from creating lookalike domains.

And as I think has been hashed out before, if we attempt to boil the ocean, which is what you're suggesting, we will fail.

Actually, all I was going to suggest was that if SSP purports to manage addresses on the From: line, it should manage all of them rather than arbitrarily giving N-1 of them a free pass.

because simply SOMEONE taking responsibility for the message mandates the need to establish reputation of that someone

Indeed. Does this mean you agree that SSP only applies to unsigned messages? (Actual non-rhetorical question.)

R's,
John
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>