ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: random stangers, was 1: 1

2008-01-18 14:21:05
John L wrote:
Ah, now we're getting somewhere.

Why badly configured SSP is any different is beyond me. Frankly, I'd be a lot more worried about badly administered RBL's and their ilk

I'm quite concerned about badly administered DNSBLs. That's why I use DNSBLs run by people I know and trust, rather than DNSBLs run by random strangers.

Using SSP is a whole lot like using random DNSBLs run by strangers -- in both cases you're asking someone who has no particular credibility whether to discard your incoming mail. If you wouldn't do one, why would you do the other?

Assumedly the first party has some desire to get their mail delivered.
That's a lot different than a RBL who might have an agenda, be lazy
or both. The first party always has the ability to correct the problem
too, unlike RBL's.

                Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>