Michael Thomas wrote:
Dave Crocker wrote:
ps. as for why I am pursuing it, it is in the hope that a degree of
professional civility might eventually be imposed on the list and that
postings which tend to undermine that civility might occur with more
restraint than has so far been the pattern.
Who elected you the civility adjudicator? Last I heard that was the
chairs job. I'm really not interested in this meta argument.
The idea that only a designated person may ask after the utility of your
making a summary dismissal of an active thread with diverse (and serious)
postings is somewhat interesting, but really only as a distraction.
In a group focused on accountability, it does seem ironic that you won't take
seriously a query about your own.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html