ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Seriously.

2008-01-23 15:52:52

On Jan 23, 2008, at 1:07 PM, Hector Santos wrote:

There were various proposals which allowed a receiver to lookup the SSP and determine which 3rd party domains where allowed to sign on its behalf.

However, I believe, the concern was that it did not scale well, i.e., how large can be 3PS list be in the SSP record?

Hector,

Please review the SSP extension for third-party authorization:

http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dkim/draft-otis-dkim-tpa-ssp-02.txt

The TPA-SSP technique easily scales and can include _every_ major legitimate MTA known to exist within the entire world! Confirmation of authorization requires a single small DNS transaction. This technique can resolve DSN issues for third-party domains as well.

TPA-SSP offers a significant security improvement over other delegation techniques. Provider MTAs would not need to warehouse their customer's private keys, accept the delegation of their customer's domain, or maintain CNAME relationships with published keys in conjunction with the use of different selectors. Management of TPA- SSP authorizations can be handled autonomously as well without impacting the normal operation of the MTA.

-Doug _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>