This is a fair point. We need some words that don't create a normative
dependency on reputation and accreditation systems that are out of
scope. Suggestions welcomed.
If the specification is restricted to statements of the type "here is what I,
an author domain, do, in case you a receiver find it useful to know" then
these issues become greatly simplified.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
Are you are saying- If the Sender domain does not appear in the Author
domain's SSP mark as suspicious?
Regards,
Damon
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html