ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Seriously.

2008-01-23 15:37:26

On Jan 23, 2008, at 1:06 PM, Jon Callas wrote:

So here's my magic wand: make an SSP option that says, signall +multiplefrom. In other words, it says that I sign all, and it's okay to have a multiple-from. Without that modifer, there will be no multiple-froms.

If you don't like this, tweak the multiplefrom modifier to singlefrom, change defaults or anything else.

Jon,

The multiple From email-address issue can not be resolved using an SSP assertion. When N number of email-address domains are considered by a verifier to be too many for the SSP discovery process, the SSP process must conclude with the message then failing SSP compliance. A reasonable minimum for the maximum number of domains that should receive SSP discovery must be established by the SSP specification. Would anyone have problems with a setting where the minimum maximum is 4? Although a simple problem to solve, this would establish a limit for all other types of email.

-Doug
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>