Dave Crocker wrote:
JD,
2. Your second point says that there should be an 'applicability
statement' for SSP, to clarify the scenarios in which it makes sense to
use and the ones it does not.
I'm sorry, but this is getting ridiculous. Can we stop this madness
already!? Its like you don't listen to anyone or ignore everything that
is been stated and written in 5016 and you keep on trying to find some
reason, or keep trying to make it a controversy, to convince everyone
that SSP is "BAD" and they should use REPUTATION services instead.
We already been through this and there are clear stated REAL WORLD
scenarios where PEOPLE want certain (restrictive) policies over others.
--
Sincerely
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html