Jim Fenton wrote:
The definition of the Adjudicator is out of scope of the SSP
specification.
If an "adjudicator" decides to reject mail RFC 4408 (+ errata)
propose corresponding SMTP reply and enhanced status codes.
Maybe SSP can also offer this, "roll your own" is a bad idea.
o Changed "Originator" to "Author" throughout (issue 1529).
Thanks.
o Removed "t=y" (testing) flag (issue 1540).
Good.
o Introduced the concepts of "SSP Checker" and "Adjudicator".
Fine, roughly what RFC 4408 has as "checkhost algorithm" spitting
out a result, what receivers (~ adjudicators) do with the result
is in essence their business.
Frank
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html