ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

[ietf-dkim] Re: A proposal for restructuring SSP

2008-01-26 03:43:01
Jim Fenton wrote:
 
The definition of the Adjudicator is out of scope of the SSP
specification.

If an "adjudicator" decides to reject mail RFC 4408 (+ errata)
propose corresponding SMTP reply and enhanced status codes.

Maybe SSP can also offer this, "roll your own" is a bad idea.

o  Changed "Originator" to "Author" throughout (issue 1529).

Thanks.

o  Removed "t=y" (testing) flag (issue 1540).

Good.

o  Introduced the concepts of "SSP Checker" and "Adjudicator".

Fine, roughly what RFC 4408 has as "checkhost algorithm" spitting
out a result, what receivers (~ adjudicators) do with the result
is in essence their business.

 Frank

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html