ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: A proposal for restructuring SSP

2008-01-29 17:28:56
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 11:39:17AM +0100, Frank Ellermann wrote:
Jim Fenton wrote:

The definition of the Adjudicator is out of scope of the SSP
specification.

If an "adjudicator" decides to reject mail RFC 4408 (+ errata)
propose corresponding SMTP reply and enhanced status codes.

Interesting suggestion Frank. In you mind would this be a 5.7.x
enhanced status code?


--
:: Jeff Macdonald | Director of Messaging Technologies
:: e-Dialog | jmacdonald(_at_)e-dialog(_dot_)com
:: 131 Hartwell Ave. | Lexington, MA 02421
:: v: 781-372-1922 | f: 781-863-8118
:: www.e-dialog.com

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html