John L wrote:
It wouldn't be harmful to say "This only applies to 822 or 2822
conformatnt messages", but it would be redundant.
Maybe there's a compromise, proposed SSP security consideration:
"Treating [SSP FAIL] more harshly than syntactically invalid
messages not allowing to apply SSP could turn out to be a
very stupid strategy."
Replace "SSP FAIL" by the corresponding weasel words of the week.
Frank
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html