ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: replace use of term "suspicious"

2008-01-18 11:11:34
That description will work 


Bill Oxley
Messaging Engineer
Cox Communications
404-847-6397

-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Arvel Hathcock
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 12:43 PM
To: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: replace use of term "suspicious"


The specification needs to use a label that is is a neutral,
technical
description of the state, rather than a value judgment on legitimacy.

If this issue has already been closed please ignore this message.  If 
not, I like "Compliant" and "Non-Compliant".

Arvel


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html