Re: [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE: replace use of term "suspicious"2008-01-18 10:52:42> The specification needs to use a label that is is a neutral, technical > description of the state, rather than a value judgment on legitimacy.If this issue has already been closed please ignore this message. If not, I like "Compliant" and "Non-Compliant". Arvel _______________________________________________NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
|
|