Arvel Hathcock wrote:
> The specification needs to use a label that is is a neutral, technical
> description of the state, rather than a value judgment on legitimacy.
If this issue has already been closed please ignore this message. If
not, I like "Compliant" and "Non-Compliant".
Sounds reasonable.
Just to make sure I understand the uses: Non-Compliant would be used in place
of Suspicious?
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html