On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 10:41:05AM -0800, Dave Crocker wrote:
Jeff Macdonald wrote:
In any event, "on behalf of" is key wording that permits more flexibility
than you seem to be acknowledging. Note, for example, that the agent
specified in the Sender field is acting "on behalf of" the author.
Is that agent authorized to work "on behalf of" the author?
Seems so:
<http://www.bartleby.com/64/C003/0169.html>
I guess I wasn't clear. A Bad Actor can decide to be an agent to work
"on behalf" any other. It doesn't mean he was authorized to do so.
--
:: Jeff Macdonald | Director of Messaging Technologies
:: e-Dialog | jmacdonald(_at_)e-dialog(_dot_)com
:: 131 Hartwell Ave. | Lexington, MA 02421
:: v: 781-372-1922 | f: 781-863-8118
:: www.e-dialog.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html