> The original proposal in the issue, "All text that causes SSP to be
> applied to an already-signed message needs to be removed," could be
> interpreted as discouraging the use of SSP anytime there is any valid
> signature on a message.
That is precisely what I understand this proposal to be advocating. If
I'm wrong I would love some clarification.
Arvel
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html