Stephen Farrell wrote:
Can you check that these seem ok, or comment where they don't?
Do you have <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.dkim/8533/> ?
I don't see it, disussed deep within some monster-threads,
but the report was fairly clear:
| Subject: NEW ISSUE: remove [FWS] (was: SSP Issues list)
| Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:25:24 +0100
[...]
| Message-ID: <fjjll8$vk7$1(_at_)ger(_dot_)gmane(_dot_)org>
| References: <475D08E5(_dot_)2090202(_at_)cs(_dot_)tcd(_dot_)ie>
[...]
| Stephen Farrell wrote:
|
| > If anyone else has any SSP issues they'd like to
| > raise, now would be a good time.
|
| [FWS] within DNS records is just wrong.
|
| Frank
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html