Dave Crocker wrote:
Stephen Farrell wrote:
Would you please explain the basis for assessing that this topic got
sufficient discussion and that there was rough consensus on it?
See above "I mainly saw..."
Qualifiers are nice, but pointing out that they were used does not
provide an explanation for an assessment.
Sorry Dave, but I don't see how I can provide a better explanation
than that. I really don't get what you find unclear there.
S.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html