ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP

2008-01-27 07:52:41
For SSP to have any value, I need to have the ability to handle the following 
scenario

joebob.org SSP = isp.foo.com is my signing entity
isp.foo.com SSP = I sign 3rd party mail 
http://foo.com/list_of_entities_I_sign_for

without a way of stating that I wont be able to serve a million business 
customers who have no clue on how to manage DNS or do DKIM which rather slows 
adoption rates. Without this the only people doing DKIM will be the spammers 
(most of my currently signed mail is from spammers) and large phished entities 
like paypal. Now since I have a speaking relationship with paypal I dont need 
to use SSP for them. 
thanks,
Bill


-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Fenton [mailto:fenton(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com]
Sent: Sun 1/27/2008 2:44 AM
To: Oxley, Bill (CCI-Atlanta)
Cc: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] A proposal for restructuring SSP
 
Bill(_dot_)Oxley(_at_)cox(_dot_)com wrote:
I will state <LOUDLY> that without the ability to handle 3rd party signing 
statements, SSP is useless to me.</LOUDLY>
  

Can you clarify what you mean by "3rd party signing statements"?  Normal 
volume level is fine.

-Jim




_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html