Michael Thomas wrote:
Dave Crocker wrote:
J D Falk wrote:
Dave Crocker asked:
Bill(_dot_)Oxley(_at_)cox(_dot_)com wrote:
MUA how to reliably display something useful about the above
information
What is the basis for having the MUA as a goal in our work here?
Even if it isn't, we'll need a clearer answer for all the people who
expect it to be.
"DKIM and SSP are for filtering engines, not the recipient's MUA."
The fallacy here is that an MUA and a filtering engine cannot
coexist. Which of course they do all the time.
There is no statement that they cannot co-exist, so it's probably better not
to assert that such a statement is false.
The statement is that SSP is intended for processing by a filtering engine and
that it has no direct MUA-related intent.
Where is this quote from? It needs to be fixed.
I invented it, in response to the "we'll need a clearer answer" preceding it.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html