Jim Fenton wrote:
a message contrary to the published SSP, and it did its job.
I count this is a success.
"Working as designed" is a compelling argument. Let's use
Arvel's "Sender" proposal instead of renaming SSP to "FASP".
Please keep the revised "author" terminology, Arvel's idea
is for cases where "Sender" picks one of the author domains.
Frank
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html