ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE 1525 -- Clarification about posting by first Author

2008-01-22 11:18:03
1) It sounds like you are saying that, unless I expect that a receiver is going to use that fact as a binary decision point to accept or reject a piece of mail it is not worth expressing

Oh, no. I am trying to say that senders should stick to what they know about. "I sign all my mail" certainly qualifies.

2) We have to build SSP assuming that people are only ever going to use this information by itself and that they for some reason do not have access to any other information about the sender.

Actually, I feel quite the opposite, that receivers will make their filtering decisions based on all sorts of useful information from multiple sources. But I still don't understand why anyone expects "I'm a phish target" from some random stranger to be useful. If you have access to a lot of receiver data, e.g., a large ISP, you probably know way more about that the sender does.

R's,
John
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>