Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal to amend SSP draft with a reporting address (fwd)2008-02-28 15:18:56On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Florian Sager wrote: Thanks for this reminder, I forgot about this draft: maybe section 4.1 can be extended by s.th. like "a Reports are requested for passed signatures inside mails with suspicious content". The same intent may already be included in 4.2 "s ... signed and Suspicious". Not a bad idea. Any comments from others? _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
|
|