Eric,
Thanks for noting this. The details in that portion of the draft are painfully
vestigal and needs to solidly embrace the trust arena of an ADMD, rather than
just focus on particular modules within the ADMD.
d/
Eric Allman wrote:
In reviewing the documents prior to the meeting today, I noticed an
oddity in draft-ietf-dkim-overview-09. The intro to section 5 says
"The MSA signs the message..." and "The MDA verifies the
signature...". However, this isn't necessarily true, and in fact
conflicts with 3.1.2 (Implementation Locality), 5.2 (Signing), 5.3
(Verifying), and 5.6 (DKIM Placement within an ADMD).
If those words are intended to be relative to just the DKIM service
then I suggest other wording such as "DKIM Signing Agent (DSA)" and
"DKIM Verification Agent (DVA)".
eric
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html