IETF DKIM (date)
March 27, 2008
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation, Tony Hansen, 15:36
- [ietf-dkim] [psg.com #1570] [Comment] Discussion of assessments in Selector Construct section, rt+dkim, 15:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: various overview editorial suggestions, Stephen Farrell, 14:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: various overview editorial suggestions, Stephen Farrell, 14:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: The term identity in the overview, Dave Crocker, 14:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: The term identity in the overview, Stephen Farrell, 14:17
- [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Even more overview editorials, Stephen Farrell, 13:57
March 26, 2008
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: various overview editorial suggestions, Dave Crocker, 16:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: The term identity in the overview, Dave Crocker, 16:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: various overview editorial suggestions, Siegel, Ellen, 15:51
- [ietf-dkim] New Issue: various overview editorial suggestions, Stephen Farrell, 14:46
- [ietf-dkim] New Issue: The term identity in the overview, Stephen Farrell, 14:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation, Jim Fenton, 01:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation, Dave Crocker, 01:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation, Jim Fenton, 01:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Overview and Signing vs. Practices (was Re: New Issue: Discussion of assessments in Selector Construct section), Dave Crocker, 01:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Overview and Signing vs. Practices (was Re: New Issue: Discussion of assessments in Selector Construct section), Jim Fenton, 01:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation, Dave Crocker, 00:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation, Dave Crocker, 00:25
- [ietf-dkim] Overview and Signing vs. Practices (was Re: New Issue: Discussion of assessments in Selector Construct section), Dave Crocker, 00:20
March 25, 2008
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation, J D Falk, 16:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation, Jim Fenton, 16:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Development & Deployment guide improperly uses normative language, SM, 15:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550), J D Falk, 14:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Development & Deployment guideimproperly uses normative language, J D Falk, 14:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation, J D Falk, 14:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Discussion of assessments in Selector Construct section, Douglas Otis, 13:57
- [ietf-dkim] dkim-overview-09/ Verification, Douglas Otis, 13:21
- [ietf-dkim] dkim-overview-09 /authentication scope per derivatives, Douglas Otis, 13:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation, Mark Delany, 12:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation, Mark Delany, 12:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation, Jim Fenton, 12:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation, Jim Fenton, 12:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Discussion of assessments in Selector Construct section, Jim Fenton, 11:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation, Tony Hansen, 02:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation, Mark Delany, 02:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation, Tony Hansen, 02:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation, Mark Delany, 02:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Discussion of assessments in Selector Construct section, Dave Crocker, 02:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation, Dave Crocker, 01:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1553: note on figure in overview draft, Dave Crocker, 01:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Treatment of verification failure not really a goal, Jim Fenton, 01:40
- [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Discussion of assessments in Selector Construct section, Jim Fenton, 01:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation, Jim Fenton, 01:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Treatment of verification failure not really a goal, Dave Crocker, 01:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1553: note on figure in overview draft, Jim Fenton, 01:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation, Dave Crocker, 01:21
- [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Treatment of verification failure not really a goal, Jim Fenton, 01:07
- [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Overview service-type and delegation, Jim Fenton, 00:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1553: note on figure in overview draft, Jim Fenton, 00:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1553: note on figure in overview draft, Dave Crocker, 00:35
March 23, 2008
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: note on figure in overview draft, John L, 22:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: note on figure in overview draft, John Levine, 20:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: note on figure in overview draft, Douglas Otis, 18:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: note on figure in overview draft, Dave Crocker, 17:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: note on figure in overview draft, Dave Crocker, 17:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Wording in draft-ietf-dkim-overview-09, Dave Crocker, 17:21
March 21, 2008
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Development & Deployment guide improperly uses normative language, Bill.Oxley, 14:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Development & Deployment guide improperly uses normative language, Dave Crocker, 11:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550), John Levine, 11:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Development & Deployment guide improperly uses normative language, John Levine, 11:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Development & Deployment guide improperly uses normative language, Eliot Lear, 10:21
- [ietf-dkim] something else (was: Re: Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550)), Stephen Farrell, 10:12
- [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Development & Deployment guide improperly uses normative language, Eliot Lear, 09:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] fyi: new issues delay..., Eliot Lear, 09:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550), Douglas Otis, 01:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550), Scott Kitterman, 00:46
March 20, 2008
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550), Dave Crocker, 23:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550), Steve Atkins, 23:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550), Sandy Wills, 23:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550), Dave Crocker, 22:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550), Sandy Wills, 21:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550), MH Michael Hammer (5304), 18:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1535 - clarify need for domain existence check in the decision tree (step 2), Jim Fenton, 17:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550), SM, 16:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550), Arvel Hathcock, 16:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1535 - clarify need for domain existence check in the decision tree (step 2), Dave Crocker, 15:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550), Murray S. Kucherawy, 15:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550), Dave Crocker, 13:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550), John Levine, 13:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550), Jim Fenton, 12:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550), Dave Crocker, 12:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550), Pasi(_dot_)Eronen(_at_)nokia(_dot_)com, 12:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550), Hector Santos, 12:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550), Nick Edwards, 12:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550), Charles Lindsey, 11:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550), Douglas Otis, 11:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550), Eric Allman, 11:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: overview document does not mention message validity, Siegel, Ellen, 11:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550), Siegel, Ellen, 11:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550), John Levine, 10:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550), Tony Hansen, 09:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550), Wietse Venema, 08:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550), Frank Ellermann, 07:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: overview doc could benefit from minorediting, Frank Ellermann, 06:30
- [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550), Stephen Farrell, 06:03
March 19, 2008
- {Blocked Content} [ietf-dkim] [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header-14.txt], Dave Crocker, 22:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: overview document does not mention message validity, Al Iverson, 22:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: overview document does not mention message validity, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 21:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: overview doc mentions signing policies, but leaves us hanging, Dave Crocker, 20:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: overview document does not mention message validity, Dave Crocker, 20:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1534: Applying SSP to sub-domains does not work, Douglas Otis, 18:33
- [ietf-dkim] fyi: new issues delay..., Eliot Lear, 15:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: overview doc could benefit from minor editing, J D Falk, 14:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: overview doc mentions signing policies, but leaves us hanging, J D Falk, 14:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: overview document does not mention message validity, J D Falk, 14:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] [dkim unverified] Issue #1534: Applying SSP to sub-domains does not work, Jim Fenton, 14:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1535 - clarify need for domain existence check in the decision tree (step 2), Jim Fenton, 14:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1534: Applying SSP to sub-domains does not work, Jim Fenton, 14:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: overview doc could benefit from minor editing, Frank Ellermann, 05:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: overview doc could benefit from minor editing, Dave Crocker, 00:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: "Mediator" used before defined in overview doc, Dave Crocker, 00:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New issue: overview doc mentions signing policies, but leaves us hanging, Dave Crocker, 00:07
March 18, 2008
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: overview document does not mention message validity, Dave Crocker, 23:56
- [ietf-dkim] New Issue: "Mediator" used before defined in overview doc, J D Falk, 19:39
- [ietf-dkim] New issue: overview doc mentions signing policies, but leaves us hanging, J D Falk, 19:37
- [ietf-dkim] New Issue: overview document does not mention message validity, J D Falk, 19:36
- [ietf-dkim] New Issue: overview doc could benefit from minor editing, J D Falk, 19:34
- [ietf-dkim] TPA-label draft updated, Douglas Otis, 19:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1535 - clarify need for domain existence check in the decision tree (step 2), Douglas Otis, 15:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1535 - clarify need for domain existence check in the decision tree (step 2), Frank Ellermann, 14:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1535 - clarify need for domain existence check in the decision tree (step 2), Dave Crocker, 14:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1535 - clarify need for domain existence check in the decision tree (step 2), Steve Atkins, 13:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1535 - clarify need for domain existence check in the decision tree (step 2), Douglas Otis, 13:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] title vs. dns nodename (was Re: Issue 1550 ...), J D Falk, 13:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1535 - clarify need for domain existence check in the decision tree (step 2), Dave Crocker, 12:12
- [ietf-dkim] title vs. dns nodename (was Re: Issue 1550 ...), Dave Crocker, 12:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1535 - clarify need for domain existence check in the decision tree (step 2), Barry Leiba, 11:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Barry Leiba, 11:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] sender-auth-header, Frank Ellermann, 04:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] What's the errata process for RFC4871?, Frank Ellermann, 04:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1534: Applying SSP to sub-domains does not work, Douglas Otis, 04:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] What's the errata process for RFC4871?, SM, 00:33
March 17, 2008
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1534: Applying SSP to sub-domains does not work, Hector Santos, 21:05
- [ietf-dkim] What's the errata process for RFC4871?, Mark Delany, 20:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1534: Applying SSP to sub-domains does not work, Douglas Otis, 19:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1534: Applying SSP to sub-domains does not work, Hector Santos, 16:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] sender-auth-header, Murray S. Kucherawy, 15:38
- [ietf-dkim] Issue #1534: Applying SSP to sub-domains does not work, Jim Fenton, 15:11
March 14, 2008
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still disagreement on "Author", Dave Crocker, 15:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still disagreement on "Author", Douglas Otis, 15:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still disagreement on "Author", Arvel Hathcock, 15:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still disagreement on "Author", Dave Crocker, 14:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still disagreement on "Author", Arvel Hathcock, 13:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still disagreement on "Author", J D Falk, 13:18
- [ietf-dkim] For info, Frank Ellermann, 07:59
- [ietf-dkim] sender-auth-header (was: New Issue: Appendix A in "overview"), Frank Ellermann, 07:51
March 13, 2008
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still disagreement on "Author", Arvel Hathcock, 22:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Third parties in "overview", Dave Crocker, 15:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Steve Atkins, 15:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Third parties in "overview", Wietse Venema, 15:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Bill.Oxley, 15:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Third parties in "overview", Frank Ellermann, 14:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Third parties in "overview", Dave Crocker, 13:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Third parties in "overview", Siegel, Ellen, 12:31
- [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Appendix A in "overview", Frank Ellermann, 10:21
- [ietf-dkim] New Issue: "Prior work" in the overview memo, Frank Ellermann, 10:14
- [ietf-dkim] New Issue: perpetrate abuse in "overview", Frank Ellermann, 10:14
- [ietf-dkim] New Issue: Third parties in "overview", Frank Ellermann, 09:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Hector Santos, 03:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Mark Delany, 01:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", John Levine, 00:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Michael Thomas, 00:00
March 12, 2008
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Al Iverson, 21:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Douglas Otis, 20:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still disagreement on "Author", Murray S. Kucherawy, 19:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Jon Callas, 18:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Michael Thomas, 17:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Stephen Farrell, 17:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Appeals to Authority, Stephen Farrell, 17:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Michael Thomas, 17:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Eric Allman, 16:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Appeals to Authority, Stephen Farrell, 16:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Appeals to Authority, J D Falk, 16:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Stephen Farrell, 16:03
- [ietf-dkim] Appeals to Authority, Michael Thomas, 15:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Issue: note on figure in overview draft, Jim Fenton, 15:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Michael Thomas, 15:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Jim Fenton, 15:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1535 - clarify need for domain existence check in the decision tree (step 2), Jim Fenton, 15:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Dave Crocker, 15:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Michael Thomas, 14:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Michael Thomas, 14:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Dave Crocker, 14:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", J D Falk, 14:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Michael Thomas, 14:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Dave Crocker, 14:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", J D Falk, 14:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", J D Falk, 14:06
March 11, 2008
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Dave Crocker, 23:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", MH Michael Hammer (5304), 20:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Wietse Venema, 20:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Eric Allman, 19:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Wietse Venema, 19:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Michael Thomas, 18:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Michael Thomas, 18:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Dave Crocker, 18:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Michael Thomas, 18:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Dave Crocker, 18:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Douglas Otis, 17:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", MH Michael Hammer (5304), 15:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Michael Thomas, 15:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1535 - clarify need for domain existence check in the decision tree (step 2), Steve Atkins, 15:28
- [ietf-dkim] policy compliance at domain or identity, Douglas Otis, 15:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Dave Crocker, 15:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1535 - clarify need for domain existence check in the decision tree (step 2), Douglas Otis, 15:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Michael Thomas, 14:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Dave Crocker, 14:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Stephen Farrell, 14:38
- [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Dave Crocker, 14:23
- [ietf-dkim] Issue 1535 - clarify need for domain existence check in the decision tree (step 2), Dave Crocker, 14:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft summary for IETF 71 DKIM meeting, Barry Leiba, 14:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft summary for IETF 71 DKIM meeting, Michael Thomas, 13:42
- [ietf-dkim] Draft summary for IETF 71 DKIM meeting, DKIM Chair, 12:52
- [ietf-dkim] New Issue: note on figure in overview draft, John Levine, 01:24
March 07, 2008
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal to amend SSP draft with a reportingaddress (fwd), MH Michael Hammer (5304), 13:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal to amend SSP draft with a reporting address (fwd), J D Falk, 13:43
- [ietf-dkim] Request for IPv6 testers to dkim.org and mipassoc.org, Dave Crocker, 13:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal to amend SSP draft with a reportingaddress (fwd), J D Falk, 13:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal to amend SSP draft with a reporting address (fwd), John Levine, 11:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal to amend SSP draft with a reporting address (fwd), Michael Thomas, 11:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal to amend SSP draft with a reporting address (fwd), Dave Crocker, 11:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal to amend SSP draft with a reporting address (fwd), Michael Thomas, 10:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal to amend SSP draft with a reporting address (fwd), Dave Crocker, 09:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal to amend SSP draft with a reporting address (fwd), Florian Sager, 09:11
March 03, 2008
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue #1547: MX records (was: ASP 4.2.2, Step 2: name existence check), Douglas Otis, 21:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposed issues addressed by SSP-03 for closure, Jim Fenton, 20:23
- [ietf-dkim] Issue #1547: MX records (was: ASP 4.2.2, Step 2: name existence check), Jim Fenton, 19:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ASP 4.2.2, Step 2: name existence check, Douglas Otis, 18:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] name existence vs ASP, Steve Atkins, 17:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ASP 4.2.2, Step 2: name existence check, Jim Fenton, 17:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposed issues addressed by SSP-03 for closure, Eliot Lear, 17:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposed issues addressed by SSP-03 for closure, Douglas Otis, 17:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] name existence vs ASP, John Levine, 16:43
- [ietf-dkim] ASP 4.2.2, Step 2: name existence check, Dave Crocker, 08:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-iab-dns-choices-05 and tree climbing (fwd), Jim Fenton, 01:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-iab-dns-choices-05 and tree climbing (fwd), Dave Crocker, 00:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-iab-dns-choices-05 and tree climbing (fwd), Jim Fenton, 00:00
March 01, 2008
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposed issues addressed by SSP-03 for closure, Jim Fenton, 21:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposed issues addressed by SSP-03 for closure, Jim Fenton, 20:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposed issues addressed by SSP-03 for closure, Frank Ellermann, 20:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposed issues addressed by SSP-03 for closure, Stephen Farrell, 18:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposed issues addressed by SSP-03 for closure, John Levine, 18:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposed issues addressed by SSP-03 for closure, Stephen Farrell, 14:07
- [ietf-dkim] draft-iab-dns-choices-05 and tree climbing (fwd), John Levine, 13:37
- [ietf-dkim] draft-iab-dns-choices-05 and tree climbing, John Levine, 12:29
- [ietf-dkim] Proposed issues addressed by SSP-03 for closure, Jim Fenton, 10:33