ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue 1550)

2008-03-20 09:10:24
I vote for retaining SSP.  The challenges this group is tackling are
complex enough, I'd hate to confuse the industry further.  


[ ] ADSP - Administrative Domain Signing Practices (**)
[ ] ADSP - Author Domain Signing Practices
[ ] ASP - Author Signing Practices
[ ] FroDo - From Domain Signing Practices
[ ] SPAD - Signing Practices of Author Domains
[X] SSP - Sender Signing Practices

Nick

IronPort Systems


-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Eric Allman
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 7:34 AM
To: Stephen Farrell; ietf-dkim
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Practices protocol naming poll (Closing issue
1550)


[ ] ADSP - Administrative Domain Signing Practices (**)
[X] ADSP - Author Domain Signing Practices
[ ] ASP - Author Signing Practices
[ ] FroDo - From Domain Signing Practices
[ ] SPAD - Signing Practices of Author Domains
[ ] SSP - Sender Signing Practices

eric

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>