Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *bri

Stephen Farrell wrote:

I think a strawpoll where you can +1 all the ones you like might work
(if we've more than 2 or 3 options). Happy to get feedback on that.


Sounds good from here, so long as it really can be resolved in a week.

At present I mildly prefer ADSP over FroDoSigPo, because "author domain"
will encourage people's brains to engage to figure out WTF an "author"
is.  Either way, though, the non-IETF people who'll actually be relying
on this stuff will be about equally confused.


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
*Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", (continued)* *Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Michael Thomas* *Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Stephen Farrell* *Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Al Iverson* *Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Michael Thomas* [ietf-dkim] Appeals to Authority, Michael Thomas Re: [ietf-dkim] Appeals to Authority, J D Falk Re: [ietf-dkim] Appeals to Authority, Stephen Farrell Re: [ietf-dkim] Appeals to Authority, Stephen Farrell *Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", MH Michael Hammer (5304)* *Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Douglas Otis* *Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", J D Falk* <= *Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Dave Crocker* *Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Douglas Otis* *Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Jim Fenton* *Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Dave Crocker* *Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Frank Ellermann* *Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Douglas Otis* *Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Barry Leiba* [ietf-dkim] title vs. dns nodename (was Re: Issue 1550 ...), Dave Crocker Re: [ietf-dkim] title vs. dns nodename (was Re: Issue 1550 ...), J D Falk *Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Eric Allman*

Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"

Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author"