Re: [ietf-dkim] title vs. dns nodename (was Re: Issue 1550 ...)

Dave wrote:

Names should be specific, in order to anticipate additional names.
"SigningPractice" is pretty darn general.


Yep.  I forsee Non-Author Signing Practices in the not-too-distant
future, and we haven't yet started arguing over whether those fit in the
same record.

(This is not a request to start that argument, BTW.)

--
J.D. Falk
Receiver Products
Return Path 

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
*Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", (continued)* *Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Douglas Otis* *Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", J D Falk* *Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Dave Crocker* *Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Douglas Otis* *Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Jim Fenton* *Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Dave Crocker* *Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Frank Ellermann* *Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Douglas Otis* *Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Barry Leiba* [ietf-dkim] title vs. dns nodename (was Re: Issue 1550 ...), Dave Crocker Re: [ietf-dkim] title vs. dns nodename (was Re: Issue 1550 ...), J D Falk <= *Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Eric Allman* *Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Wietse Venema* *Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Dave Crocker* *Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Eric Allman* *Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Michael Thomas* *Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Stephen Farrell* *Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Michael Thomas* *Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", John Levine* *Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Mark Delany* *Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open briefly); there's still,disagreement on "Author", Hector Santos*