ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still,disagreement on "Author"

2008-03-15 00:55:16
Sorry I missed this earlier.

Given the acronym, I feel an overwhelming compulsion to shoot the suggestion 
down.  (Or am I mis-remembering the british WWI fighter?)

In spite of that, I like it.

d/

Jim Fenton wrote:
Stephen Farrell wrote:
Let's say folks have 1 week to suggest new names (without
long essays please, Dave's mail is a good model). The
issue here is solely the name.
  
Just for the sake of being thorough, I'm going to cite a tiny concern 
with ADSP and something that might address that concern.

"Author Domain Signing Practices" can be parsed a couple of ways.  It 
could be (Author Domain) Signing Practices [the intended meaning] or 
Author (Domain Signing) Practices.  Of course, this protocol does not 
describe which authors sign domains (whatever that means).

Proposed alternative:  Signing Practices of Author Domains (SPAD).  It's 
even something you can pronounce, if that matters.

-Jim

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html


-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>