Again, to repeat what I said at the mic:
The current, 3-step procedure is certainly an improvement, however I do not
understand the need for the second step, in terms of ASP functionality.
In any early discussion of this, I believe Jim said he thought it was a
carry-over from an earlier version of the spec where the need was more clear.
In any event, I think the current question is: What is it about ASP -- as
opposed to concerns outside of ASP's scope -- that requires checking for domain
existence?
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html