Jim,
Jim Fenton wrote:
I don't think that the interpretation of multiple valid signatures is
beyond the scope of this document. The overview was created in order to
provide information on how DKIM might be used; ignoring the multiple
signature case does not serve that purpose well.
For the draft text I circulated in a message postd Sun, 23 Mar 2008 22:39:17
-0700, what changes are you suggesting. (Or elsewhere in the document?)
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html