Arvel explained:
I think this approach is good enough in my case because although I
have been overly optimistic at times concerning our progress I have
nevertheless been warning my customers that SSP is contentious (much
MUCH more so than BASE) and thus likely to go through several
revisions. I've sort of smoothed this over by reminding customers
that they were helping the process by using the various incarnations
and reporting on any technical failings. So far, I've not been
flooded with complaints other than "you people hurry up and get this
done already" which is to be expected.
Do you think that the change to _asp or _adsp or _frodo and
all/discardable will cause unhappiness amongst your installed base, or
should we keep going with the near-consensus changes?
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html