ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue 1550 - the name of the document (remains open *briefly*); there's still disagreement on "Author"

2008-03-14 11:39:54
Now I know you are fibbing.

You are saying that your customers actually remember being warned.

Have you been seeling to some off-world market niche?

d/

Arvel Hathcock wrote:
 > Do you think that the change to _asp or _adsp or _frodo and
 > all/discardable will cause unhappiness amongst your installed base, or
 > should we keep going with the near-consensus changes?

No, not unhappiness.  At most some will consider it a minor annoyance 
but they will recall that they were warned to expect this.  So, it's not 
a major issue to me.

Arvel



_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html


-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html