Michael Thomas wrote:
I'd be happy to change it back to ssp and ignore this churn altogether.
I wouldn't. More importantly, I believe the working group achieved consensus
on
the current name.
Remember: each name change == interoperability stopper.
I'd be quite interested in seeing your logic-chain to justify that assertion,
for names on a draft document.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html