My own view is that it's problematic to refer to what isn't, what is
underway, or what might be. It invites extraneous hassles, when there
is no need. The one exception might be to constrain scope, such as is
done in the list at the end of 1.1.
I was trying to read as if I wasn't a regular participant on ietf-dkim
-- in which case the obvious question, upon reading about signing
practices, is "wait, /how/ do I publish my practices?"
Further, I think the agreement in the working group was to add more
discussion about signing practices when they are approved by the IESG.
That works for me.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html