Dave Crocker wrote:
Jim Fenton wrote:
The last paragraph also suggests the use of different sub-domains
for d=, but does not point out that the author address must also
follow suit, otherwise the message may not be seen to be in
compliance with Signing Policy.
I don't understand. What is there in the DKIM signing protocol that
requires the author adress to "follow suit"?
Not in the signing protocol, but in ADSP. If an email with a From
address of, say, statements(_at_)example(_dot_)com is signed with
d=transaction.example.com then the signature cannot be an Author
Signature.
I thought we had agreed to defer having the Overview document talk
abut the Signing Practices material until it is standardized?
Notwithstanding the fact that the Overview Document does currently talk
about Signing Practices, we should avoid giving advice that we expect to
conflict with Signing Practices, even without mentioning them explicitly.
-Jim
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html