ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] protecting domains that don't exist

2008-04-14 12:41:35
Frank Ellermann:
<robert(_at_)barclayfamily(_dot_)com> wrote:

Would it be better if "error" were a specifically defined
result in addition to "unknown" / "all" / "discardable"?

The fourth bullet in chapter 3.2 "ASP results" offers "the
domain does not exist" after "unknown"/"all"/"discardable".

I-D.kucherawy-sender-auth-header chapter 2.4.2 "ASP results"
lists this as "nxdomain".  IMHO good enough, or do you have
something else in mind ?  Let's s/ASP/ADSP/g + WGLC, s.v.p.

Sounds reasonable. I expect many will implement NXDOMAIN as a
fourth ADSP lookup result in some way or another. 

This explains more easily than my earlier claim (an NXDOMAIN result
cannot correspond with one of "unknown" / "all" / "discardable").

        Wietse
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>