ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] protecting domains that don't exist

2008-05-01 15:38:20
Steve Atkins wrote:
On Apr 29, 2008, at 3:30 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:

  

Really?  How about Section 1 of RFC 5016?

    

It doesn't contain any operational justification or goal for
SSP. It describes what (one person) wants from SSP, it
does not explain why, and it definitely doesn't provide the
operational problem that SSP is intended to mitigate.
  

As for the (one person) part, we did go through WGLC on this document.  
Someone else said they weren't paying attention, and that's unfortunate, 
but there were lots of us that were.

-Jim


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [ietf-dkim] protecting domains that don't exist, Jim Fenton <=