IETF DKIM (date)
May 31, 2008
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Streamline Abstract, SM, 13:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Modify ADSP Lookup Procedure, Eliot Lear, 13:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Streamline Abstract, Dave Crocker, 13:01
- [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: various minor documentation enhancements, Dave Crocker, 10:14
- [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Modify tagging text, Dave Crocker, 10:08
- [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Revise wildcard discussion, Dave Crocker, 10:04
- [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Streamline Abstract, Dave Crocker, 09:57
- [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: fix ADSP's xml2rfc 'code', Dave Crocker, 09:45
- [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: Modify ADSP Lookup Procedure, Dave Crocker, 09:39
May 30, 2008
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Wietse Venema, 10:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Damon, 09:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Bill.Oxley, 09:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Domain Existence Check ssp-03 vs levine-adsp-00, John Levine, 08:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Domain Existence Check ssp-03 vs levine-adsp-00, Jeff Macdonald, 07:40
- [ietf-dkim] New issue: ADSP result set, New issue: ADSP status codes (was: ADSP result set), Frank Ellermann, 07:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Jon Callas, 06:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 06:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Discussion of Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Tony Hansen, 05:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Charles Lindsey, 03:20
May 29, 2008
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Tony Hansen, 23:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Tony Hansen, 22:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Arvel Hathcock, 21:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Al Iverson, 14:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, J.D. Falk, 14:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Joerg Backschues, 13:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Douglas Otis, 12:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Dave Crocker, 11:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Frank Ellermann, 11:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Eric Allman, 11:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Jim Fenton, 11:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] portable reputation, Eliot Lear, 10:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, robert, 09:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] portable reputation, Dave Crocker, 09:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Dave Crocker, 09:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Siegel, Ellen, 09:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The purpose of an existence/validity check, Jeff Macdonald, 09:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Jeff Macdonald, 08:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The purpose of an existence/validity check, Jeff Macdonald, 08:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] portable reputation, John Levine, 08:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Steve Atkins, 07:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] portable reputation, Eliot Lear, 07:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] portable reputation, John Levine, 07:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Eliot Lear, 07:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Jeff Macdonald, 07:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, John Levine, 07:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Tony Finch, 04:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The purpose of an existence/validity check, Eliot Lear, 03:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00, Stephen Farrell, 03:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The purpose of an existence/validity check, Charles Lindsey, 03:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Fwd: Re: domain existence check, Charles Lindsey, 03:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00 vs draft-otis-dkim-adsp-002, Charles Lindsey, 03:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00, Charles Lindsey, 03:15
- [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Stephen Farrell, 02:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirement for one ADSP record per DNS entry is irrelevant, Stephen Farrell, 02:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The purpose of an existence/validity check, Eliot Lear, 01:27
May 28, 2008
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP result set, Douglas Otis, 23:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP result set, Frank Ellermann, 21:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The purpose of an existence/validity check, Douglas Otis, 15:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The purpose of an existence/validity check, Douglas Otis, 15:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The purpose of an existence/validity check, J D Falk, 14:40
- [ietf-dkim] [Fwd: Re: What is the standard DNS "call back"?], Dave Crocker, 14:26
- [ietf-dkim] The purpose of an existence/validity check, Dave Crocker, 12:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP result set (was: why we should clearly specify domain existence), Douglas Otis, 10:39
- [ietf-dkim] ADSP result set (was: why we should clearly specify domain existence), Frank Ellermann, 07:12
May 27, 2008
- Re: [ietf-dkim] why we should clearly specify domain existence, Douglas Otis, 16:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirement for one ADSP record per DNS entry is irrelevant, Douglas Otis, 12:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirement for one ADSP record per DNS entry is irrelevant, Eliot Lear, 11:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE Re: requirement for one ADSP record per DNS entry makes ADSP undeployable, Eliot Lear, 11:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Fwd: Re: domain existence check, Douglas Otis, 10:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Fwd: Re: domain existence check, Bill.Oxley, 10:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE Re: requirement for one ADSP record per DNS entry makes ADSP undeployable, Steve Atkins, 09:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] why we should clearly specify domain existence, Frank Ellermann, 09:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirement for one ADSP record per DNS entry is irrelevant, Dave Crocker, 09:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirement for one ADSP record per DNS entry makes ADSP undeployable, Al Iverson, 09:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] why we should clearly specify domain existence, Tony Finch, 09:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirement for one ADSP record per DNS entry is irrelevant, Eliot Lear, 09:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirement for one ADSP record per DNS entry makes ADSP undeployable, Eliot Lear, 08:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirement for one ADSP record per DNS entry is irrelevant, Eliot Lear, 08:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirement for one ADSP record per DNS entry is irrelevant, Frank Ellermann, 08:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirement for one ADSP record per DNS entry makes ADSP undeployable, Dave Crocker, 08:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirement for one ADSP record per DNS entry is irrelevant, John Levine, 08:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirement for one ADSP record per DNS entry is irrelevant, Eliot Lear, 08:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirement for one ADSP record per DNS entry is irrelevant, John Levine, 08:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] why we should clearly specify domain existence, Frank Ellermann, 08:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirement for one ADSP record per DNS entry makes ADSP undeployable, Eliot Lear, 07:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirement for one ADSP record per DNS entry is irrelevant, Eliot Lear, 07:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirement for one ADSP record per DNS entry is irrelevant, John Levine, 06:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] why we should clearly specify domain existence, Tony Finch, 06:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirement for one ADSP record per DNS entry makes ADSP undeployable, Frank Ellermann, 05:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] why we should clearly specify domain existence, Frank Ellermann, 05:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirement for one ADSP record per DNS entry makes ADSP undeployable, Eliot Lear, 05:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirement for one ADSP record per DNS entry makes ADSP undeployable, Frank Ellermann, 05:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirement for one ADSP record per DNS entry makes ADSP undeployable, Eliot Lear, 04:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] why we should clearly specify domain existence, Tony Finch, 04:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] requirement for one ADSP record per DNS entry makes ADSP undeployable, Frank Ellermann, 04:11
- [ietf-dkim] NEW ISSUE Re: requirement for one ADSP record per DNS entry makes ADSP undeployable, Eliot Lear, 02:21
- [ietf-dkim] requirement for one ADSP record per DNS entry makes ADSP undeployable, Eliot Lear, 02:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] why we should clearly specify domain existence, Frank Ellermann, 01:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00 vs draft-otis-dkim-adsp-002, Douglas Otis, 00:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00, Douglas Otis, 00:32
May 26, 2008
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00 vs draft-otis-dkim-adsp-002, Charles Lindsey, 20:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00, Charles Lindsey, 20:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00, Charles Lindsey, 20:42
- [ietf-dkim] Fwd: Re: domain existence check, Charles Lindsey, 20:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] why we should clearly specify domain existence, Douglas Otis, 17:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] why we should clearly specify domain existence, Tony Finch, 17:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00, Stephen Farrell, 17:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] why we should clearly specify domain existence, Eliot Lear, 15:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] why we should clearly specify domain existence, Wietse Venema, 15:11
May 25, 2008
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00, Hector Santos, 16:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00 vs draft-otis-dkim-adsp-002, Douglas Otis, 13:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] why we should clearly specify domain existence, Tony Finch, 09:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00, Wietse Venema, 07:15
- [ietf-dkim] why we should clearly specify domain existence, Eliot Lear, 02:10
May 24, 2008
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00, Arvel Hathcock, 17:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00, Arvel Hathcock, 15:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The challenge of an 'nxdomain' straw poll, Arvel Hathcock, 15:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00, Frank Ellermann, 14:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00, Al Iverson, 14:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00, Douglas Otis, 14:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00, John Levine, 13:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The challenge of an 'nxdomain' straw poll, Douglas Otis, 12:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00, Frank Ellermann, 12:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00, Dave Crocker, 12:11
- [ietf-dkim] The challenge of an 'nxdomain' straw poll, Dave Crocker, 11:41
- [ietf-dkim] draft-otis-dkim-adsp-02, Douglas Otis, 11:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00, Arvel Hathcock, 11:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00, Arvel Hathcock, 10:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00, Eliot Lear, 10:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00, Dave Crocker, 09:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00, Al Iverson, 09:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00, Eliot Lear, 09:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00, Frank Ellermann, 09:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00, Dave Crocker, 09:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00, Arvel Hathcock, 08:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00, John Levine, 08:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] domain existence check, Arvel Hathcock, 08:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00, Douglas Otis, 08:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00, Arvel Hathcock, 08:02
May 23, 2008
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00, Dave Crocker, 22:46
- [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00, John Levine, 21:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] domain existence check, Mark Delany, 21:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] domain existence check, Arvel Hathcock, 20:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] domain existence check, Tony Finch, 11:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] domain existence check, Charles Lindsey, 05:30
May 22, 2008
- Re: [ietf-dkim] domain existence check, Frank Ellermann, 18:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] domain existence check, Douglas Otis, 17:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] domain existence check, Jim Fenton, 16:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] domain existence check, Douglas Otis, 16:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] domain existence check, Tony Finch, 15:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] domain existence check, Al Iverson, 15:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] domain existence check, J D Falk, 15:28
- [ietf-dkim] gmail domainkeys contact?, Tony Hansen, 11:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] domain existence check, Dave Crocker, 11:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] domain existence check, Eric Allman, 11:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] domain existence check, Douglas Otis, 11:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] domain existence check, Steve Atkins, 11:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] domain existence check, John Levine, 10:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] subdomain strawpoll, Stephen Farrell, 03:09
May 07, 2008
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Thoughts on parent domain lookup (was Re: subdomain strawpoll), Douglas Otis, 17:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Meta-comment re: subdomain strawpoll, Douglas Otis, 17:40
- [ietf-dkim] Thoughts on parent domain lookup (was Re: subdomain strawpoll), Mike . Markley, 16:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] subdomain strawpoll, Mike . Markley, 16:50
- [ietf-dkim] Meta-comment re: subdomain strawpoll, Jim Fenton, 14:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] subdomain strawpoll, Jeff Macdonald, 13:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] forward movement, please? (was RE: Are lookalike domains like parent domains?), Jeff Macdonald, 13:01
May 02, 2008
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are lookalike domains like parent domains?, Douglas Otis, 11:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] end-users vs filtering engines, Jim Fenton, 10:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are lookalike domains like parent domains?, Arvel Hathcock, 09:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are lookalike domains like parent domains?, Arvel Hathcock, 09:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are lookalike domains like parent domains?, Tony Finch, 09:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are lookalike domains like parent domains?, Dave Crocker, 08:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are lookalike domains like parent domains?, Arvel Hathcock, 08:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are lookalike domains like parent domains?, Al Iverson, 07:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are lookalike domains like parent domains?, John Levine, 07:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] end-users vs filtering engines, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 06:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are lookalike domains like parent domains?, Pasi.Eronen, 05:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] We need a BCP, Eliot Lear, 05:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are lookalike domains like parent domains?, Tony Finch, 04:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] subdomain strawpoll, Charles Lindsey, 03:17
- [ietf-dkim] We need a BCP (was: lookalike domains ...), Charles Lindsey, 03:13
May 01, 2008
- Re: [ietf-dkim] subdomain strawpoll, Jon Callas, 21:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are subdomains like parent domains?, Al Iverson, 20:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "interoperability"???, Arvel Hathcock, 19:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "interoperability"???, Arvel Hathcock, 19:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are lookalike domains like parent domains?, Arvel Hathcock, 18:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] end-users vs filtering engines, Wietse Venema, 17:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] end-users vs filtering engines, Wietse Venema, 17:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] subdomain strawpoll, Wietse Venema, 17:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are lookalike domains like parent domains?, Douglas Otis, 17:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] forward movement, please? (was RE: Are lookalike domains like parent domains?), Douglas Otis, 17:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] forward movement, please? (was RE: Are lookalike domains like parent domains?), Douglas Otis, 16:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are lookalike domains like parent domains?, Tony Finch, 16:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] subdomain strawpoll, Jim Fenton, 16:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] end-users vs filtering engines, Jim Fenton, 16:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are lookalike domains like parent domains?, Jim Fenton, 16:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "interoperability"???, Jim Fenton, 16:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "interoperability"???, Jim Fenton, 16:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are lookalike domains like parent domains?, Arvel Hathcock, 16:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are lookalike domains like parent domains?, Jim Fenton, 16:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] forward movement, please? (was RE: Are lookalike domains like parent domains?), Arvel Hathcock, 16:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are lookalike domains like parent domains?, Jim Fenton, 16:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] forward movement, please? (was RE: Are lookalike domains like parent domains?), Jim Fenton, 15:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are subdomains like parent domains?, Jim Fenton, 15:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are lookalike domains like parent domains?, Jim Fenton, 15:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are subdomains like parent domains?, Jim Fenton, 15:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] protecting domains that don't exist, Jim Fenton, 15:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] forward movement, please? (was RE: Are lookalike domains like parent domains?), Jim Fenton, 15:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "interoperability"???, Dave Crocker, 15:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are subdomains like parent domains?, John Levine, 15:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] forward movement, please? (was RE: Are lookalike domains like parent domains?), Arvel Hathcock, 15:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are lookalike domains like parent domains?, Steve Atkins, 15:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] end-users vs filtering engines, Dave Crocker, 15:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are lookalike domains like parent domains?, Steve Atkins, 15:07
- [ietf-dkim] "interoperability"???, Dave Crocker, 15:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] end-users vs filtering engines, Steve Atkins, 14:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] end-users vs filtering engines, J D Falk, 14:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] end-users vs filtering engines, Wietse Venema, 14:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] subdomain strawpoll, J D Falk, 14:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] end-users vs filtering engines, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 12:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ietf-dkim Digest, Vol 118, Issue 8, Murray S. Kucherawy, 11:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] subdomain strawpoll, Al Iverson, 11:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] subdomain strawpoll, robert, 10:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] forward movement, please?, robert, 10:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] forward movement, please? (was RE: Are lookalike domains like parent domains?), robert, 10:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] subdomain strawpoll, Bill.Oxley, 10:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] subdomain strawpoll, Stephen Farrell, 09:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] subdomain strawpoll, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 09:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] subdomain strawpoll, Siegel, Ellen, 09:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] subdomain strawpoll, Frank Ellermann, 09:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] subdomain strawpoll, Arvel Hathcock, 08:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] subdomain strawpoll, Daniel Dreymann, 08:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] subdomain strawpoll, Dave Crocker, 08:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] subdomain strawpoll, John Levine, 08:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are lookalike domains like parent domains?, Steve Atkins, 08:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] subdomain strawpoll, Dave Crocker, 08:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] treewalking vs nxdomain, Steve Atkins, 08:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] subdomain strawpoll, Steve Atkins, 08:00
- [ietf-dkim] treewalking vs nxdomain, Al Iverson, 07:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] subdomain strawpoll, Douglas Otis, 07:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are lookalike domains like parent domains?, Tony Finch, 06:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] forward movement, please? (was RE: Are lookalike domains like parent domains?), Eliot Lear, 06:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are lookalike domains like parent domains?, Eliot Lear, 06:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] subdomain strawpoll, Eliot Lear, 06:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Are lookalike domains like parent domains?, Charles Lindsey, 02:47
- [ietf-dkim] subdomain strawpoll, Stephen Farrell, 02:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] forward movement, please?, Frank Ellermann, 02:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Why only exact domains matter, Frank Ellermann, 02:04