What do you feel are the technical deficiencies of draft-levine-dkim-adsp?
The biggest problem of course is that it's not a working group document.
If we're to start working now on other documents then Doug Otis is ahead
of you guys in line since he's had a replacement offering for some time.
Let's not start down that road.
Let's just get on with having the chairs conduct a straw-poll. The
question is pathetically simple: Should the next draft of the working
group document retain the NXDOMAIN check or not? Yes or no. This is
really easy folks.
If there is insufficient consensus either way then we can either give up
or work toward some compromise language.
--
Arvel
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html