ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00

2008-05-24 12:18:26
Arvel Hathcock wrote:
 
The question is pathetically simple:  Should the next draft of the´
working group document retain the NXDOMAIN check or not?  Yes or no.

Yes.  There was no plausible or coherent argument against this check.
If receivers do this anyway they have a result in their cache, fine.

I'd like to see a WG ADSP draft without the old "parent domain" magic,
after that a PubReq, and maybe some fine tuning for Authentication-
Results if necessary.

 Frank

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html