Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check

Stephen Farrell wrote:

b. Modify, i.e. keep, but with a different set of records.


As I suggested in my own message.  Specify the records.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Stephen Farrell Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Tony Finch Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, John Levine Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Jeff Macdonald Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Jeff Macdonald Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Dave Crocker Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Eliot Lear <= Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Steve Atkins Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Frank Ellermann Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Al Iverson Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Siegel, Ellen Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, robert Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Jim Fenton Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Eric Allman Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Joerg Backschues Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check, Arvel Hathcock