On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 12:51 +0200, Eliot Lear wrote:
<snip>
If paypal were to create a new
service, it would want to borrow from its reputation. An ability to
express some means at the domain level would provide for that
portability. Absent that it has to go through the whole rigmarole all
over again.
I believe the above is off topic. However, if paypal was smart, it would
of signed its messages with a d= parameter that doesn't match any domain
currently used in their email, say d=corp.rep.paypal.com.
If they wanted to provide separate reputations for each service and be
able to take advantage of a established reputation, they'd sign twice:
d=corp.rep.paypal.com
...
d=123.rep.paypal.com
AND if they wanted ADSP, they'd sign 3 times.
--
:: Jeff Macdonald | Director of Messaging Technologies
:: e-Dialog | jmacdonald(_at_)e-dialog(_dot_)com
:: 131 Hartwell Ave. | Lexington, MA 02421
:: v: 781-372-1922 | f: 781-863-8118
:: www.e-dialog.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html