Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00

ietf-dkim

Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00

2008-05-24 17:40:23

But, if that's what is carried by even a straw poll, that pretty much
settles it, and I'd get on board.


Let me be clear as well.  I'd also quickly get behind changing the 
existing draft concerning NXDOMAIN along the lines of what's been done 
in the levine draft should that be what's needed to move forward.

Arvel

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [ietf-dkim] The purpose of an existence/validity check, (continued) Re: [ietf-dkim] The purpose of an existence/validity check, Charles Lindsey Re: [ietf-dkim] The purpose of an existence/validity check, Eliot Lear Re: [ietf-dkim] portable reputation, John Levine Re: [ietf-dkim] portable reputation, Eliot Lear Re: [ietf-dkim] portable reputation, John Levine Re: [ietf-dkim] portable reputation, Dave Crocker Re: [ietf-dkim] portable reputation, Eliot Lear Re: [ietf-dkim] The purpose of an existence/validity check, Jeff Macdonald Re: [ietf-dkim] The purpose of an existence/validity check, Jeff Macdonald Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00, Al Iverson Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00, Arvel Hathcock <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00, Arvel Hathcock
Next by Date:	[ietf-dkim] why we should clearly specify domain existence, Eliot Lear
Previous by Thread:	Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-levine-dkim-adsp-00, Al Iverson
Next by Thread:	[ietf-dkim] draft-otis-dkim-adsp-02, Douglas Otis
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]