Is anybody else of the opinion that NXDOMAIN recommendations (at
least) would help fill a perceived gap if treewalking is left out? I
do feel that way. I think the point is to help provide receiver
guidance on what to do with failed mail, and providing policy guidance
for non-resolvable or unconsidered FQDNs or domains seems to be the
goal of both bits of functionality.
It feels to me as though an NXDOMAIN-related recommendation is less of
a hack and far more suitably implemented than treewalking, and I think
it might end up being a good alternate path.
Sorry to want to boil the oceans, Dave.
Best,
Al Iverson
--
Al Iverson on Spam and Deliverability, see http://www.spamresource.com
News, stats, info, and commentary on blacklists: http://www.dnsbl.com
My personal website: http://www.aliverson.com -- Chicago, IL, USA
Remove "lists" from my email address to reach me faster and directly.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html