Tony Finch wrote:
I think the specification should not prevent implementations
from using more thorough verification if they choose
For an ADSP result "nxdomain" they can't do whatever they like
better, e.g., "call back verification" might work, but it's not
the same as "nxdomain".
using resolver libraries that don't distinguish NXDOMAIN and
NODATA.
That library would not implement RFC 1035, it is insufficient
for an "nxdomain" check, and besides, do such libraries exist ?
Frank
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html