Tony Finch wrote:
It's also the definition of result "nxdomain" in Murray's draft,
if you want "nomailfqdn" (or a similar name), where NXDOMAIN is
only a proper subset, it's okay.
What's the filename of that draft?
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header-14#section-2.4.2
it's backwards to complain that we can't fix the semantics
because they will no longer match the semantics we are trying
to fix.
ACK, I didn't get that you want new precise semantics with a
new corresponding name.
Frank
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html