ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus check: Domain Existence Check

2008-05-30 06:21:40
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



b. Modify, i.e. keep, but with a different set of records.  It was
suggested that the current NXDOMAIN is incorrect, and that MX, A, and
AAAA records for the domain should be queried, with the existence of
any of these records indicating a domain that is potentially used for
email. If we have consensus for this option, then we may well need a
subsequent poll to decide the details.

B. Modify. I would go along with a consensus that what's in draft- 
levine-adsp-00, especially because I'm with J.D. Falk that I'm tired  
of debating it and think we should build something. I think the Levine  
text is good enough, but am willing to listen to suggestions on tweaks.

        Jon


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Universal 2.6.3
Charset: US-ASCII

wj8DBQFIP/AasTedWZOD3gYRApPQAKC70wSFMyjXHAXvlV871ibHv5WM2ACgwep8
dZgmBTegCnjeXus5NBGaePM=
=hQ6+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html