Re: [ietf-dkim] requirement for one ADSP record per DNS entry makes ADSP

Frank Ellermann wrote:
> Eliot Lear wrote:
>  
>   
> > The absence of a parent label check will mean that enterprises
> > must list an ADSP record for each and every DNS entry they have.
> >     
> If they wish to publish "signing practises" they can focus on
> domains actually used as "author domain", for a stupid example,
> they likely don't need any ADSP for www.example.com.
>
> There is no "requirement for one ADSP record per DNS entry", like
> there is no requirement for MX or SPF records per DNS entry.
>   
Absent those records, an author domain administrator cannot adequately 
or easily express the simple notion that only certain hosts are 
authorized to send from a domain.  We have thus missed the mark on what 
we are doing.

Eliot
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html