Re: [ietf-dkim] RFC 4871 errata

On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 10:43 +0100, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We need to give Pasi guidance on the WG's opinion of the
> various errata [1] that've been posted for RFC 4871.
I agree with the proposed changes. I do find it interesting that the
interop event hasn't happened yet. :)


-- 
Jeff Macdonald <jmacdonald(_at_)e-dialog(_dot_)com>
e-Dialog

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html