ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] RFC 4871 errata

2008-09-30 15:19:06
To answer the question about what current implementations do, I can speak 
for ours:

Regarding erratum 1383, we responded to the consensus and allow "*" 
anywhere, and more than once, in the "g=" value.

Regarding erratum 1378, we always include the "a=" in our generated 
signatures and require them when verifying, treating their absence as an 
error.  I would have no problem changing this behaviour to favour what 
section 3.3 says if that's consensus.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>